• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

MMA Payout

The Business of Combat Sports

  • Home
  • MMA
    • UFC
    • Bellator
    • One
    • PFL
  • Boxing
  • Legal
  • Ratings
  • Payouts
  • Attendance
  • Gate

Zuffa Sues for TheUltimateFighter.com

May 5, 2010 by Kelsey Philpott 1 Comment

J.R. Riddell of Sherdog.com is reporting that Zuffa has filed a lawsuit against the owner of theultimatefighter.com in attempt to gain ownership of the domain name. Zuffa currently uses the similar UltimateFighter.com to promote its reality TV series The Ultimate Fighter. Hence, its concern.

In the complaint, Zuffa alleges that it began using a number of “The Ultimate Fighter” trademarks as early as 2003. Records of the United States Patent and Trademark Office show that Zuffa filed to register trademarks in “The Ultimate Fighter” in June 2004. Zuffa’s complaint also alleges that in January 2004, an individual named Anton Resnick registered the domain name at issue with the domain registration company, eNom, Inc. Zuffa claims Resnick never used the domain name in connection with a legitimate commercial fair use, and so should therefore be deemed a “cybersquatter” under the provisions of the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (United States Code, Title 15, section 1125(d)). Zuffa cited this Act in asking the court to restrain and enjoin eNom from transferring the domain name to any other party. Zuffa’s prayer for relief includes a request for a permanent injunction requiring eNom to transfer the registration to Zuffa.

Payout Perspective:

In March, Zuffa launched the ad-supported UltimateFighter.com with the aim of increasing the reach of the popular reality TV series. The website features every episode and fight from all eleven seasons of the show. The website is somewhat of an experiment; one that might eventually allow Zuffa to host entire events on the internet through the same ad-supported model (or even a branded content model). Another upside to the ad-supported website is that it gives the company a host of tracking options that allow it to really drill down on viewership patterns and demographics.

Thus, understandably, Zuffa is looking to protect its interests by gaining ownership of similar domain names. I can’t help but be reminded of the MikeRoweSoft incident of a few years ago, but it would seem as though this issue is past the point of sending the domain holder an Xbox and calling things even.

Filed Under: legal, TUF, Zuffa

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Joe says

    May 12, 2010 at 3:00 pm

    Zuffa’s claim isn’t that strong. That’s why they’re suing in federal court under the ACPA instead of engaging in an arbitration under the UDRP.

    They’re betting that they can throw their weight around and that this defendant can not afford the cost of litigation.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Featured

Appeals Court sets date for oral argument in Zuffa appeal

Don King sends Zuffa Boxing cease and desist

Zuffa files Reply Brief in Cirkunov Antitrust Lawsuit

UFC 330 Payout Perspective

Update on CSI Entertainment – Mayweather lawsuit, Injunction request withdrawn

The Legal Submission 109 takes a look at TKO Earnings

Archives

MMA Payout Follow

MMAPayout

Why put Bazardo in? #goms

LAZ

Retweet on Twitter MMA Payout Retweeted

On September 15, 2001, Balbir Singh Sodhi was planting flowers outside his Arizona gas station when Frank Roque pulled up and fatally shot him. Roque wanted revenge for 9/11 and mistook Sodhi, a Sikh man, for a Muslim because of his turban.

Sodhi became the first person killed

Josh Naylor just sucks #Mariners

Load More

Copyright © 2026 · MMA Payout: The Business of Combat Sports