<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UFC Establishes New Mark for PPV Buys in 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mmapayout.com/2009/12/ufc-establishes-new-mark-for-ppv-buys-in-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mmapayout.com/2009/12/ufc-establishes-new-mark-for-ppv-buys-in-2009/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 02:59:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Quick Analysis....Why is Tito Ortiz in the UFC still? - Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums</title>
		<link>http://mmapayout.com/2009/12/ufc-establishes-new-mark-for-ppv-buys-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1302</link>
		<dc:creator>A Quick Analysis....Why is Tito Ortiz in the UFC still? - Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmapayout.com/?p=7486#comment-1302</guid>
		<description>[...] never looks exciting or talented.  2. The biggest myth. Tito Ortiz is NOT a draw at all anymore.   UFC Establishes New Mark for PPV Buys in 2009 : MMAPayout.com: The Business of MMA  His fight with Forrest drew 300,000 buys, and that was matched up with FORREST.   Do you know how [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] never looks exciting or talented.  2. The biggest myth. Tito Ortiz is NOT a draw at all anymore.   UFC Establishes New Mark for PPV Buys in 2009 : MMAPayout.com: The Business of MMA  His fight with Forrest drew 300,000 buys, and that was matched up with FORREST.   Do you know how [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UFC 108 numbers are under 300k :-S</title>
		<link>http://mmapayout.com/2009/12/ufc-establishes-new-mark-for-ppv-buys-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1301</link>
		<dc:creator>UFC 108 numbers are under 300k :-S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 00:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmapayout.com/?p=7486#comment-1301</guid>
		<description>[...] held in North America has performed since &#8230; well, since PPV numbers for UFC events started being tracked by MMA Payout with UFC 57. The last international event to underperform that badly was UFC 85 in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] held in North America has performed since &#8230; well, since PPV numbers for UFC events started being tracked by MMA Payout with UFC 57. The last international event to underperform that badly was UFC 85 in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can Mixed Martial Arts ever become more popular then professional wrestling? - Page 2 - Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums</title>
		<link>http://mmapayout.com/2009/12/ufc-establishes-new-mark-for-ppv-buys-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1300</link>
		<dc:creator>Can Mixed Martial Arts ever become more popular then professional wrestling? - Page 2 - Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 00:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmapayout.com/?p=7486#comment-1300</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Time for the UFC to hold PPV Events every other Month - Page 2 - Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums</title>
		<link>http://mmapayout.com/2009/12/ufc-establishes-new-mark-for-ppv-buys-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1299</link>
		<dc:creator>Time for the UFC to hold PPV Events every other Month - Page 2 - Sherdog Mixed Martial Arts Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmapayout.com/?p=7486#comment-1299</guid>
		<description>[...] from a business stand point, it wouldn&#039;t make sense for them to reduce the number they put out.  UFC Establishes New Mark for PPV Buys in 2009 : MMAPayout.com: The Business of MMA   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from a business stand point, it wouldn&#39;t make sense for them to reduce the number they put out.  UFC Establishes New Mark for PPV Buys in 2009 : MMAPayout.com: The Business of MMA   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelsey Philpott</title>
		<link>http://mmapayout.com/2009/12/ufc-establishes-new-mark-for-ppv-buys-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1298</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelsey Philpott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 15:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmapayout.com/?p=7486#comment-1298</guid>
		<description>Kangaroo,

We have to approve the first post from every new user e-mail. Obviously we&#039;re not erasing posts in the comments section - if that were the case, why would we even bother having one in the first place? (Although I will admit to erasing a sum total of four posts from one piece, simply because they were discriminatory in nature; something we have zero tolerance for).

As to your concern: the UFC currently holds an 85-90% market share from our estimates (that is it earns 85-90% of the MMA industry revenues accounted for by promotions). I think that if you follow the site on a daily basis you&#039;ll see that we also do our best to cover Strikeforce, WEC, Dream, Sengoku, and others when we can - or when they make relevant headlines.

But, seriously, what do you expect? This is a business website - and as business goes there often isn&#039;t a lot to discuss other than UFC news. Moreover, the UFC being the industry leader, it&#039;s often what people what to hear most.

&quot;...give them what they want.&quot;

And, if it&#039;s not what they want? They&#039;re free not to read it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kangaroo,</p>
<p>We have to approve the first post from every new user e-mail. Obviously we&#8217;re not erasing posts in the comments section &#8211; if that were the case, why would we even bother having one in the first place? (Although I will admit to erasing a sum total of four posts from one piece, simply because they were discriminatory in nature; something we have zero tolerance for).</p>
<p>As to your concern: the UFC currently holds an 85-90% market share from our estimates (that is it earns 85-90% of the MMA industry revenues accounted for by promotions). I think that if you follow the site on a daily basis you&#8217;ll see that we also do our best to cover Strikeforce, WEC, Dream, Sengoku, and others when we can &#8211; or when they make relevant headlines.</p>
<p>But, seriously, what do you expect? This is a business website &#8211; and as business goes there often isn&#8217;t a lot to discuss other than UFC news. Moreover, the UFC being the industry leader, it&#8217;s often what people what to hear most.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;give them what they want.&#8221;</p>
<p>And, if it&#8217;s not what they want? They&#8217;re free not to read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kangaroo</title>
		<link>http://mmapayout.com/2009/12/ufc-establishes-new-mark-for-ppv-buys-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1297</link>
		<dc:creator>kangaroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 07:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmapayout.com/?p=7486#comment-1297</guid>
		<description>this is so hilarious.....the writer is erasing comments that he dosent agree with...this site is pretty much propaganda...lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is so hilarious&#8230;..the writer is erasing comments that he dosent agree with&#8230;this site is pretty much propaganda&#8230;lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kangaroo</title>
		<link>http://mmapayout.com/2009/12/ufc-establishes-new-mark-for-ppv-buys-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1296</link>
		<dc:creator>kangaroo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 03:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmapayout.com/?p=7486#comment-1296</guid>
		<description>you should change the title of the website into UFC payout...why dont you feature other mma promotions in this website...is the ufc the only profitable mma organization? so mma is like the WWE? one org making money and the others arent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you should change the title of the website into UFC payout&#8230;why dont you feature other mma promotions in this website&#8230;is the ufc the only profitable mma organization? so mma is like the WWE? one org making money and the others arent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mmaguru</title>
		<link>http://mmapayout.com/2009/12/ufc-establishes-new-mark-for-ppv-buys-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1295</link>
		<dc:creator>mmaguru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 23:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmapayout.com/?p=7486#comment-1295</guid>
		<description>Thanks Kelsey,
Always great to see these stats.  Another banner year for the UFC.  Year over year it appears they add an additional PPV event.  Here&#039;s looking forward to 2010 and another successful year for the UFC and the growth of MMA.

Any chance we can get to see gate/revenue comparisons for these events year over year?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Kelsey,<br />
Always great to see these stats.  Another banner year for the UFC.  Year over year it appears they add an additional PPV event.  Here&#8217;s looking forward to 2010 and another successful year for the UFC and the growth of MMA.</p>
<p>Any chance we can get to see gate/revenue comparisons for these events year over year?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jj</title>
		<link>http://mmapayout.com/2009/12/ufc-establishes-new-mark-for-ppv-buys-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1294</link>
		<dc:creator>jj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 22:57:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmapayout.com/?p=7486#comment-1294</guid>
		<description>You should do one for UFC&#039;s ratings year over year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should do one for UFC&#8217;s ratings year over year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://mmapayout.com/2009/12/ufc-establishes-new-mark-for-ppv-buys-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-1293</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 20:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmapayout.com/?p=7486#comment-1293</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by MMAPayoutdotcom: This week&#039;s feature on MMAPayout.com: #UFC establishes new mark for PPV buys in 2009 (est. 8 million in total) http://tinyurl.com/yjbr69y...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by MMAPayoutdotcom: This week&#8217;s feature on MMAPayout.com: #UFC establishes new mark for PPV buys in 2009 (est. 8 million in total) <a href="http://tinyurl.com/yjbr69y.." rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/yjbr69y..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

