<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UFC 107: 620,000 Buys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mmapayout.com/2009/12/ufc-107-620000-buys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mmapayout.com/2009/12/ufc-107-620000-buys/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:39:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: UFC Fighter &#187; UFC Rebounds With 620000 Pay-Per-View Buys For UFC 107</title>
		<link>http://mmapayout.com/2009/12/ufc-107-620000-buys/comment-page-1/#comment-1287</link>
		<dc:creator>UFC Fighter &#187; UFC Rebounds With 620000 Pay-Per-View Buys For UFC 107</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 14:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmapayout.com/?p=7462#comment-1287</guid>
		<description>[...] an early Christmas present from fans in the form of 620,000 buys for UFC 107. From Dave Meltzer via MMA Payout: After four straight disappointing numbers, UFC 107 shocked pretty much everyone, affirming the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an early Christmas present from fans in the form of 620,000 buys for UFC 107. From Dave Meltzer via MMA Payout: After four straight disappointing numbers, UFC 107 shocked pretty much everyone, affirming the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mmaguru</title>
		<link>http://mmapayout.com/2009/12/ufc-107-620000-buys/comment-page-1/#comment-1286</link>
		<dc:creator>mmaguru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 22:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmapayout.com/?p=7462#comment-1286</guid>
		<description>Sure, here is the link regarding the 1.6 million buys
hxxp://mmajunkie.com/news/17217/high-flying-ufc-boss-dana-white-training-for-base-jump-off-mandalay-bay.mma

as always replace the &quot;xx&quot; with &quot;tt&quot;.

Merry Christmas all, no sense getting into a huge debate over guessed numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, here is the link regarding the 1.6 million buys<br />
hxxp://mmajunkie.com/news/17217/high-flying-ufc-boss-dana-white-training-for-base-jump-off-mandalay-bay.mma</p>
<p>as always replace the &#8220;xx&#8221; with &#8220;tt&#8221;.</p>
<p>Merry Christmas all, no sense getting into a huge debate over guessed numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brain Smasher</title>
		<link>http://mmapayout.com/2009/12/ufc-107-620000-buys/comment-page-1/#comment-1285</link>
		<dc:creator>Brain Smasher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 22:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmapayout.com/?p=7462#comment-1285</guid>
		<description>HBO is releasing estimates based on early reports just like Metger. The difference is HBO is allowed to get the info and Metger is using souces who arent supposed to be releasing the info. So his numbers are based on a little less solid info. Also it may be easier to predict boxing numbers because it has a longer history on PPV. A clear pattern in PPV buys while MMA is a volatile young sport that is still growing rapidly plus many other factors like the number of PPVs effecting individual PPVs.

Here is some comments i found real quick.
............................................

USA Today reported Monday that early indications from cable companies were that the scheduled 12-round light-welterweight bout could get as many as two million buys.

Co-promoter Bob Arum was delighted with the figures especially as initial estimates were suggesting about one million boxing fans would shell out their cash.

&quot;We know based on those early numbers and based on experience the event will perform extremely well. If I had to guess, anywhere between 1.6 million and two million homes, which is a home run,&quot; he said.

The record for a PPV event is the 2.4 million buys for &#039;Golden Boy&#039; Oscar De La Hoya&#039;s May 2007 fight with Floyd Mayweather Jr., which generated a staggering $134 million in revenue.


....................................................

By Johnny Benz The excellent Pay Per View Numbers that were reported by HBO shortly after Oscar De La Hoya lost a split decision to Floyd Mayweather Jr., back in the month of May, were $2.15 million pay-per-view buys. That related to $120 million in PPV revenue, plus a live gate just shy of $19 million and total gross receipts of about $150 million that shattered every boxing box office record. Now Dan Rafael on behalf of ESPN is reporting in his Thursday column that the [b] numbers have been revised by HBO and the new numbers are even more impressive than first published [/b], improving the record. Rafael reports in his article: &quot;HBO said with the buys now fully accounted for, the fight actually generated 2.4 million buys and $134.4 million in domestic PPV revenue, bringing the total revenue for the event to approximately $165 million.&quot; Quoted by ESPN, HBO PPV chief Mark Taffet stated: &quot;It is common for early pay-per-view tallies to rise once all the buys are counted, but...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HBO is releasing estimates based on early reports just like Metger. The difference is HBO is allowed to get the info and Metger is using souces who arent supposed to be releasing the info. So his numbers are based on a little less solid info. Also it may be easier to predict boxing numbers because it has a longer history on PPV. A clear pattern in PPV buys while MMA is a volatile young sport that is still growing rapidly plus many other factors like the number of PPVs effecting individual PPVs.</p>
<p>Here is some comments i found real quick.<br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>USA Today reported Monday that early indications from cable companies were that the scheduled 12-round light-welterweight bout could get as many as two million buys.</p>
<p>Co-promoter Bob Arum was delighted with the figures especially as initial estimates were suggesting about one million boxing fans would shell out their cash.</p>
<p>&#8220;We know based on those early numbers and based on experience the event will perform extremely well. If I had to guess, anywhere between 1.6 million and two million homes, which is a home run,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>The record for a PPV event is the 2.4 million buys for &#8216;Golden Boy&#8217; Oscar De La Hoya&#8217;s May 2007 fight with Floyd Mayweather Jr., which generated a staggering $134 million in revenue.</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>By Johnny Benz The excellent Pay Per View Numbers that were reported by HBO shortly after Oscar De La Hoya lost a split decision to Floyd Mayweather Jr., back in the month of May, were $2.15 million pay-per-view buys. That related to $120 million in PPV revenue, plus a live gate just shy of $19 million and total gross receipts of about $150 million that shattered every boxing box office record. Now Dan Rafael on behalf of ESPN is reporting in his Thursday column that the [b] numbers have been revised by HBO and the new numbers are even more impressive than first published [/b], improving the record. Rafael reports in his article: &#8220;HBO said with the buys now fully accounted for, the fight actually generated 2.4 million buys and $134.4 million in domestic PPV revenue, bringing the total revenue for the event to approximately $165 million.&#8221; Quoted by ESPN, HBO PPV chief Mark Taffet stated: &#8220;It is common for early pay-per-view tallies to rise once all the buys are counted, but&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://mmapayout.com/2009/12/ufc-107-620000-buys/comment-page-1/#comment-1284</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 21:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmapayout.com/?p=7462#comment-1284</guid>
		<description>I would like to know why boxing PPV #&#039;s are officially released on the Friday following the fight, while it takes months to get the final #&#039;s for UFC PPV&#039;s.  I&#039;ve never heard of any revisions being made to boxing PPV #&#039;s months after they&#039;re released, so I have to assume the announced #&#039;s  are accurate. HBO would have a legal duty to correct erroneous #&#039;s because they are a division of a publicly traded company, and investors rely on such public statements in making investment decisions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to know why boxing PPV #&#8217;s are officially released on the Friday following the fight, while it takes months to get the final #&#8217;s for UFC PPV&#8217;s.  I&#8217;ve never heard of any revisions being made to boxing PPV #&#8217;s months after they&#8217;re released, so I have to assume the announced #&#8217;s  are accurate. HBO would have a legal duty to correct erroneous #&#8217;s because they are a division of a publicly traded company, and investors rely on such public statements in making investment decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Geer</title>
		<link>http://mmapayout.com/2009/12/ufc-107-620000-buys/comment-page-1/#comment-1283</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Geer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 19:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmapayout.com/?p=7462#comment-1283</guid>
		<description>So annoying. They are estimates...thats what Meltzer reports...he reports estimates based off of historical data...1.6 to 1.8 and people are acting like he compared 1.8 to 500k. Its so funny people dispute Meltzer when he has so many sources within the industry(both mma and cable) that give him accurate information.

The UFC has never released pay per view numbers because the numbers seemingly come in at a snails pace over as much as a 9 month period. I work in cable and advertising there really are only trending numbers based off of history.

620k is a great number and it could actually come up as much as 650 or 660 or as low as 575 or 580. Being off by 50k in one direction or the other isnt so bad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So annoying. They are estimates&#8230;thats what Meltzer reports&#8230;he reports estimates based off of historical data&#8230;1.6 to 1.8 and people are acting like he compared 1.8 to 500k. Its so funny people dispute Meltzer when he has so many sources within the industry(both mma and cable) that give him accurate information.</p>
<p>The UFC has never released pay per view numbers because the numbers seemingly come in at a snails pace over as much as a 9 month period. I work in cable and advertising there really are only trending numbers based off of history.</p>
<p>620k is a great number and it could actually come up as much as 650 or 660 or as low as 575 or 580. Being off by 50k in one direction or the other isnt so bad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brain Smasher</title>
		<link>http://mmapayout.com/2009/12/ufc-107-620000-buys/comment-page-1/#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator>Brain Smasher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 18:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmapayout.com/?p=7462#comment-1282</guid>
		<description>How can the UFC Lie when they never release their PPVs? You guys crack me up. Metger works for Yahoo and runs his own website and maybe some other interests. He isnt a UFC official. GIve it a rest already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can the UFC Lie when they never release their PPVs? You guys crack me up. Metger works for Yahoo and runs his own website and maybe some other interests. He isnt a UFC official. GIve it a rest already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://mmapayout.com/2009/12/ufc-107-620000-buys/comment-page-1/#comment-1281</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 17:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmapayout.com/?p=7462#comment-1281</guid>
		<description>Timmy, who says they didn&#039;t?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Timmy, who says they didn&#8217;t?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timmy</title>
		<link>http://mmapayout.com/2009/12/ufc-107-620000-buys/comment-page-1/#comment-1280</link>
		<dc:creator>Timmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmapayout.com/?p=7462#comment-1280</guid>
		<description>If the UFC was going to lie, don&#039;t you think they would have jacked up the numbers for the last 4 events?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the UFC was going to lie, don&#8217;t you think they would have jacked up the numbers for the last 4 events?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan Kosek</title>
		<link>http://mmapayout.com/2009/12/ufc-107-620000-buys/comment-page-1/#comment-1279</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan Kosek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmapayout.com/?p=7462#comment-1279</guid>
		<description>Guru,

Can you link a story where Dana confirms 1.6?  It&#039;s not that I don&#039;t believe you, I can just only find stories where he confirms 1.5 + due to the base jumping stunt he&#039;s going to do, but didn&#039;t say a specific number.

Let&#039;s look at the bigger picture, even if you want to say Meltzer is 20% off mostly, and everyone thinks he always overestimates, that&#039;s still roughly 500k in buys, which is still good, especially considering it ended up being an entertaining card.

Also, how does everyone know Meltzer is wrong?  The UFC doesn&#039;t release their PPV numbers, so any other source you guys are using to compare Meltzer&#039;s &#039;wrong&#039; numbers are every bit, if not more due to Meltzer&#039;s years of PPV sources, as questionable.

There is no upside in him inflating numbers.  A good way to tell might be looking at early WWE PPV projections if he releases those because I believe since WWE is publicly traded they end up releasing PPV numbers in some of their public reports.  However, hearing interviews with wrestlers, the final number takes months to get in, because that&#039;s when the companies get their money from the broadcasters and the top end wrestlers get their bonuses.  It&#039;s basically what crippled ECW if anyone knows that story.  They went to the PPV model, actually had some OK buys but were bouncing checks because they didn&#039;t get paid on their PPVs for many months after.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guru,</p>
<p>Can you link a story where Dana confirms 1.6?  It&#8217;s not that I don&#8217;t believe you, I can just only find stories where he confirms 1.5 + due to the base jumping stunt he&#8217;s going to do, but didn&#8217;t say a specific number.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s look at the bigger picture, even if you want to say Meltzer is 20% off mostly, and everyone thinks he always overestimates, that&#8217;s still roughly 500k in buys, which is still good, especially considering it ended up being an entertaining card.</p>
<p>Also, how does everyone know Meltzer is wrong?  The UFC doesn&#8217;t release their PPV numbers, so any other source you guys are using to compare Meltzer&#8217;s &#8216;wrong&#8217; numbers are every bit, if not more due to Meltzer&#8217;s years of PPV sources, as questionable.</p>
<p>There is no upside in him inflating numbers.  A good way to tell might be looking at early WWE PPV projections if he releases those because I believe since WWE is publicly traded they end up releasing PPV numbers in some of their public reports.  However, hearing interviews with wrestlers, the final number takes months to get in, because that&#8217;s when the companies get their money from the broadcasters and the top end wrestlers get their bonuses.  It&#8217;s basically what crippled ECW if anyone knows that story.  They went to the PPV model, actually had some OK buys but were bouncing checks because they didn&#8217;t get paid on their PPVs for many months after.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brain Smasher</title>
		<link>http://mmapayout.com/2009/12/ufc-107-620000-buys/comment-page-1/#comment-1278</link>
		<dc:creator>Brain Smasher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mmapayout.com/?p=7462#comment-1278</guid>
		<description>Guru

you need to learn more about the subject you talk about. Even Dana himself dont know the numbers of PPV buys. There is NO exact number for a very long time. PPV buys are always rolling in. Dana himself said it takes at least 6 months to get close to the final numbers and even then there are PPVs coming in. There is not just one Satellite Provider, there are many. There isnt just one cable provider there are hundreds of smaller local companies that have to report their buys ever so often. This takes a long time for all these number to be reported back to the parent companies.

Noone wants to wait 6 months for a better idea of the final numbers of a PPV. We are 2 weeks or so away from 107 and he has already released numbers. Im sure there will be a few more PPV buys added to the final numbers but not that many. Most PPVs providers are still showing replays you can buy.

Metger has been wrong before but not very often. He relys on sources inside  many providers. If one of those sources make a mistake it can make his numbers way off. But this is very rare. I have followed his and other PPV numbers for many many years and he is the most reliable bar none. You can think your guess&#039; are just as good but they are not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guru</p>
<p>you need to learn more about the subject you talk about. Even Dana himself dont know the numbers of PPV buys. There is NO exact number for a very long time. PPV buys are always rolling in. Dana himself said it takes at least 6 months to get close to the final numbers and even then there are PPVs coming in. There is not just one Satellite Provider, there are many. There isnt just one cable provider there are hundreds of smaller local companies that have to report their buys ever so often. This takes a long time for all these number to be reported back to the parent companies.</p>
<p>Noone wants to wait 6 months for a better idea of the final numbers of a PPV. We are 2 weeks or so away from 107 and he has already released numbers. Im sure there will be a few more PPV buys added to the final numbers but not that many. Most PPVs providers are still showing replays you can buy.</p>
<p>Metger has been wrong before but not very often. He relys on sources inside  many providers. If one of those sources make a mistake it can make his numbers way off. But this is very rare. I have followed his and other PPV numbers for many many years and he is the most reliable bar none. You can think your guess&#8217; are just as good but they are not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

